I. SpecOps Roundtable
Spec Ops Roundtable - PoCKey PillarsSteward ElectionsIdeas
IDEAS: Exploring TiersIDEAS: New User AcquisitionIDEAS: Industry/Sector Groups?IDEAS: Exploring Pledge / Tithe
Thought Piece: Exploring Tiered Commitments and Project Lifecycle in Roundtable Participation
Introduction
In the world of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and blockchain projects, the concept of a roundtable represents a collaborative, decision-making body. It's a place where projects, regardless of their lifecycle stage, can come together to discuss, strategize, and make decisions that impact the collective. However, not all projects are created equal, and their commitments and lifecycle stages can vary significantly. This thought piece explores the idea of creating multiple tiers of project participation based on commitments and project lifecycle.
The Need for Tiered Participation
The roundtable, in its ideal form, should be a place of equal opportunity and voice. However, the reality of project development and commitment levels necessitates a more nuanced approach. Some projects are more mature, with significant resources and commitments, while others are in their early stages, exploring possibilities and seeking support.
Creating tiered participation levels allows for a more structured and fair approach to roundtable involvement. It ensures that projects are recognized and given voice according to their commitment and lifecycle stage, fostering a more balanced and equitable ecosystem[1][5].
Proposed Tiers of Participation
The proposed tiers of participation are as follows:
1. Tier 1 - Arbitrum Native Protocol: This tier is for projects that are native to the Arbitrum protocol. These projects have made significant commitments and are deeply integrated into the Arbitrum ecosystem[2][3][14].
2. Tier 2 - Arbitrum HQ Protocol: This tier is for projects that, while not native, have established a significant presence on the Arbitrum protocol. They have made substantial commitments and are actively contributing to the Arbitrum ecosystem[6][14].
3. Tier 3 - Multichain: This tier is for projects that operate across multiple chains, including Arbitrum. These projects have made commitments to multiple ecosystems and bring a diverse perspective to the roundtable[4][8].
4. Tier 4 - Exploring Arbitrum Expansion: This tier is for projects that are exploring the possibility of expanding into the Arbitrum ecosystem. They may not have made significant commitments yet, but they are actively considering it[11][14].
5. Tier 5 - Pre-Launch: This tier is for projects that are still in the pre-launch stage. They may not have made any commitments yet, but they are in the process of developing their project and exploring potential commitments[1][13].
These tiers can be further categorized into Diamond, Platinum, Gold, Silver, and Bronze levels, reflecting the varying degrees of commitment and lifecycle stages within each tier.
Inner and Outer Table Commitments
The roundtable can be further divided into an inner table and an outer table, based on the level of commitment. The inner table is for projects that have taken the pledge, committing either 3% of tokens or 3% of protocol income. These projects have a stronger voice and can expect to receive more from the DAO.
The outer table, on the other hand, is for projects that have not taken the pledge. While they can still participate in the roundtable, they will be handicapped in terms of how much they can expect to receive from the DAO. This structure ensures that projects are rewarded according to their level of commitment, fostering a fair and equitable ecosystem[1][5].
Conclusion
The concept of tiered participation based on commitments and project lifecycle stages offers a more structured and equitable approach to roundtable involvement. It recognizes the diverse stages and commitments of projects, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued. As the blockchain and DAO ecosystems continue to evolve, such structures will be crucial in fostering collaboration, equity, and mutual growth.